Ambushing China and the Olympics
Ambush marketers, by loose association with an international sporting event, can claim the same benefits of advertising as an official sponsor who will have paid a great deal for that status. This can result in the misappropriation of intellectual property, and allows a marketer to unfairly capitalize on the publicity surrounding an event, such as the Olympics. As China gears up for the Beijing games, this is an important issue that needs to be addressed.
Date:
April 2008
Keywords (click to search): [ambush] [marketing] [Olympics] [Expo] [advertising] [intellectual property]
By Douglas J. Wood*
Much has been written about the upcoming Olympics and how significant they are for China and its global image. There is no other international sporting event that gets more attention and attracts more participants and spectators than the Olympic Games. And by all measures, the 2008 Games in China will be the most widely publicized in history.
But beneath the politics of Steven Spielberg’s resignation as creative director and human rights issues that could leave a black eye on the festivities, with so many consumers watching the competition, there is also the serious risk that ambush marketing may significantly diminish the return on the investments made by worldwide sponsors like McDonalds, VISA, Coca-Cola, and Samsung as well as Beijing sponsors like Bank of China, China Mobile, and Air China. Unlike any Olympics in the past, the marketing community is focusing on Beijing to see if sponsorships...
To continue reading this article, you must be a subscriber.
The rest of this article is available to subscribers only. Subscribe now to continue reading this article and to have full access to all other articles and full-text translations.