China Law & Practice

Change font size:   

This article is FREE access as part of CLP Week, a weekly email newsletter written by the editors of China Law & Practice magazine. Take a two week trial to China Law & Practice and find many more related articles.

Lawyer Says: Anti-Monopoly Enforcement Agencies Not Efficient

Conflict of interest between ministries could cause extra work for lawyers

Date: July 2008

Keywords (click to search): [Anti-Monopoly] [Monopoly]

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
  • All fields are compulsory


You may email your comment to a friend
To include more than one recipient, please seperate each email address with a semi-colon ';'




Receive email notification of new comments posted by other users




EMAIL A FRIEND

To include more than one recipient, please seperate each email address with a semi-colon ';'




Three separate government agencies will be responsible for enforcing the anti-monopoly law, which will take effect on August 1.

The three bodies are the Ministry of Commerce, the National Development and Reform Commission, and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, with the anti-monopoly committee directly under the State Council.

Jiang Jiang, partner at Hylands Law Firm, said the government’s decision to have several agencies rather than one enforcement body could create unnecessary work and confusion for lawyers.

“The ministries don’t adopt the same standards, so there are conflicts of interest between them,” Jiang said. “Each of them has their own opinions, so which one should lawyers or companies listen to?”

Anti-competition cases very often involve several aspects. The complexity of cases could make it even more difficult for the ministries to collaborate with each other. Ministries’ conflicting messages could force lawyers and clients to go through more rounds of inquires.

“Not only does it waste administrative resources but it also causes unnecessary expense to companies who are making filings,” Jiang said.

But since all three agencies have been given powers to regulate certain aspects of the economy in China for many years, it would be almost impossible for them to give away their positions, he said. Yet the inefficiency of communication and cooperation between the ministries could create loopholes in the filing system.

“It happens a lot in China,” Jiang said. “It takes quite some time to communicate between departments within one ministry, not to mention between different ministries.”

Related articles:
Anti-Monopoly Law: The Lawyers are Ready, but the Law Isn’t 08 Jul 2008
The PRC Anti-monopoly Law and Foreign Mergers and Acquisitions 08 Jul 2008

China Law & Practice Events

The IFLR and Asialaw Competition Forum 2008
25 November 2008
Location: Hong Kong

The 2nd Annual Asia Pacific M&A Summit 2009
03 & 04 March 2009
Location: Hong Kong