China Law & Practice

Follow us:

profile

China Law & Practice

CLP_editorial

CLP_editorial profile

CLP_editorial CLP_editorial: CSRC cracks down on securities brokerages: http://t.co/L1Zn7HDbEO "The market mechanism is sick"

May 24 2013 06:04 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
CLP_editorial profile

CLP_editorial CLP_editorial: Read our exclusive interview with Weichai Power on its alliance with Ferrari http://t.co/YZxHkQGNtl #China

May 24 2013 05:59 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
CLP_editorial profile

CLP_editorial CLP_editorial: Our legislation roundup: highlight is new foreign investment catalogue for #China's regions: http://t.co/sAidp3tKae

May 24 2013 05:58 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

China question

"How do I terminate an employment contract?"

Magazine

Change font size: Switch to default font size Switch to medium font size Switch to large font size

Court publishes opinion on implementation of National IPR Strategy

The Supreme People’s Court sets out more detailed plans for the implementation of a number of the reforms contained in the State Council’s 2008 National IPR Strategy.

Issue: May 2009

Keywords (click to search): IP intellectual property Supreme People's Court National IPR Strategy

By Joseph Simone, Baker & McKenzie.

On March 30 2009, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued an Opinion setting out more detailed plans for the implementation of a number of the reforms contained in the State Council’s 2008 National IPR Strategy. The Opinion focuses mainly on civil and criminal enforcement of IP rights before the courts. Some highlights are:

• Deterrent penalties: The Opinion proposes that local courts “dramatically” increase the costs to infringers by raising compensation awards, thereby increasing deterrence and lowering the cost of enforcement for IP owners. The SPC particularly encourages courts to award much higher compensation against infringers that are repeat offenders, those violating rights on a “large-scale” and those otherwise acting in bad faith. The SPC has traditionally refrained from encouraging courts to award substantially higher damage awards, but now seems to have opened a door for judges to pro-actively use civil damages to...

 

Subscribe now for full access to this article

Alternatively take a Free trial, giving you access to the last 30 days of content on the site.

**Full-text translations are only available to subscribers - subscribe now**

If you are already a subscriber, login to access the rest of this article.

If you have any queries please contact Fiona Leung on +(852) 2842 6929 or email fiona.leung@euromoneyasia.com

 



China Law & Practice Events

Asialaw Australasia In-house Counsel Summit 2013
14 August 2013
Location: Sydney