China Law & Practice

Change font size:   

Avoid antitrust suspicions by approaching compliance holistically

New antitrust implementation rules clarify definitions of dominance

Issue: February 2011

Keywords (click to search): antitrust AML implementation rules compliance Baker & McKenzie

To avoid antitrust investigations, companies need to increase compliance efforts, adopt a holistic approach to mitigate legal risks, and re-visit established business practices, say counsel.

Following the January 4 publication of the National Development and Reform Commission’s (NDRC’s) Anti-price Monopoly Provisions (国家发展和改革委员会反价格垄断规定) , the government took a further step by releasing three implementation rules tackling monopolistic agreements, abuse of dominance and the abuse of administrative power. The State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) issued the set of regulations, which provides further detail to definitions of dominance.

They are the Provisions for the Prohibition by Administrations for Industry and Commerce of Acts of Monopolistic Agreements (工商行政管理机关禁止垄断协议行为的规定), the Provisions for the Prohibition by Administrations for Industry and Commerce of Acts of Abuse of Dominant Market Position (工商行政管理机关禁止滥用市场支配地位行为的规定), and the Provisions for the Suppression by Administrations for Industry and Commerce of...

Please login or register below to read this article.




Forgotten your password?

Take a Free Trial now to read the rest of this article and sample other stories from the latest issue for 1 week (excludes full text translations).



Subscribers have UNLIMITED ACCESS to Full Text Translations and archive contents dating back to 1999.

Subscribe to China Law & Practice now


Enquiry Hotlines: email subscriptions@alphk.com or call (Hong Kong) +852 2842 6929/6910, (UK) +44 (0) 20 7779 8999.



China Law & Practice Events

IFLR India Outbound Investment Forum 2012
05 July 2012
Location: Mumbai