China Law & Practice

Follow us:

profile

China Law & Practice

CLP_editorial

CLP_editorial profile

After 5 years, here's a summary of how China's National IP Strategy has been working After 5 years, here's a summary of how China's National IP Strategy has been working: http://t.co/lqygEQI22T

Jun 19 2013 08:30 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
CLP_editorial profile

The problems facing PE in #China, from @Caixin http The problems facing PE in #China, from @Caixin http://t.co/mYCxvL1qGv

Jun 19 2013 06:19 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
CLP_editorial profile

RT @jefflindsay RT @jefflindsay: China's Patent Information Annual Meeting in September: http://t.co/wD7w1S9rvq Global event from the new epicenter of IP.

Jun 19 2013 06:08 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

China question

"How do I terminate an employment contract?"

Magazine

Change font size: Switch to default font size Switch to medium font size Switch to large font size

Supreme People’s Court, Opinions on Several Issues Concerning Fully Leveraging Intellectual Property Trial Functions to Promote the Great Development and Great Flowering of Socialist Culture and to Promote Autonomous and Coordinated Economic Development
最高人民法院关于充分发挥知识产权审判职能作用推动社会主义文化大发展大繁荣和促进经济自主协调发展若干问题的意见

Claimant’s burden of proof may be reduced for monopolistic agreements that have serious anti-competitive effects.

Issue: March 2012

CLP Reference: 5100/11.12.16

Promulgated: 16 December 2011

Keywords (click to search): intellectual property IP copyright patent trademark anti-unaffair competition anti-monopoly

Issued: December 16 2011

Main contents: With respect to copyright over the internet, Article 6 states that whenever an act of providing internet services satisfies statutory conditions for exemption from liability, the internet service provider shall not be liable for damages for infringement. If such an act does not completely satisfy the statutory conditions for exemption from liability, but the internet service provider was not at fault, it too shall not be liable for damages for infringement.

Article 7 calls for duly handling the relationship between technology neutrality and determination of copyright infringement. With respect to technology that, other than principally being used for copyright infringement, has no substantive commercial purpose, it may be presumed that the technology provider ought to have known of the existence of the specific direct infringement, and shall bear joint and several liability with the direct infringer.

In respect of the imitative copying, painting, photographing or...

 

Subscribe now for full access to this article

Alternatively take a Free trial, giving you access to the last 30 days of content on the site.

**Full-text translations are only available to subscribers - subscribe now**

If you are already a subscriber, login to access the rest of this article.

If you have any queries please contact Fiona Leung on +(852) 2842 6929 or email fiona.leung@euromoneyasia.com

 



China Law & Practice Events

Asialaw Australasia In-house Counsel Summit 2013
14 August 2013
Location: Sydney

Australasia Women in Business Law Awards
15 August 2013
Location: Sydney