The invisible seat

The landmark Ningbo decision last year saw China – for the first time and through the Zhejiang court – enforce two PRC-seated awards granted by a foreign arbitral institution. Here, the case handler analyses the arbitration proceeding, offers insights and ponders the possibility of non-Chinese arbitration institutions being able to administer in China

9 minute readNovember 09, 2010 at 11:58 PM
By
clpstaff
& clp articles

Although it is quite clear that Chinese law does not recognise ad hoc arbitration where the seat is in the PRC, there exists some debate over whether the type of

A Subscription is Required to Access this Content

Subscribe to China Law & Practice today for:

  • ✓ A database of 3000+ essential documents, including key PRC laws translated into English
  • ✓ Newsletters with business-critical and sector-specific updates
  • ✓ Premium mobile access with timely analysis on China's fast-changing market

Already a Subscriber? Log In. Sign In Now

Questions? Contact us at [email protected] | 1-855-808-4530 (Americas) | 44(0) 800 098 386009 (UK & Europe)