The “Eenadu” dispute: Secondary meaning constitutes the crux

| BY

clpstaff &clp articles

Lex OrbisManisha Singh [email protected] a very recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India decided against an incense stick company from using…

Lex Orbis
Manisha Singh Nair
[email protected]


In a very recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India decided against an incense stick company from using the mark “Eenadu” in the course of its trade, noting that it had clearly attempted to utilise the reputation and goodwill of the Respondents.

This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.

  • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
  • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
  • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]