Opinion: New landscape for IP prosecution
| BY
clpstaff &clp articlesThe 2011 IP Case Report from the Supreme Court reinforces its commitment to standardising the country's IP practices
Among the 34 guiding precedents, 22 of these are dedicated to judiciary review of decisions made by the Trademark Reexamination and Appeal Board (TRAB) and Patent Review Board (PRB). Specifically, the precedents reshape how lower courts adjudicate IP cases. In particular, Beijing Higher People's Court and Beijing No 1 Intermediate Court have to follow new practices in reviewing patent validity and trademark examination decisions from the TRAB and PRB.
This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.
A Premium Subscription Provides:
- A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
- A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
- Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
Already a subscriber? Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]