MOFCOM fast-tracks anti-monopoly reviews

    June 15, 2012 | BY

    clpstaff &clp articles

    The Ministry of Commerce has proposed to streamline anti-monopoly reviews by classifying M&A transactions on the basis of market shares


    The authority has yet to decide on the threshold level ofmarket share, but Shang Ming, director of MOFCOM's Anti-monopoly Bureau, saidthat it would not be very high, according to a report by ChinaDaily.

    Henry Chen of MWE China Law Offices said: “Whether anapplication can take advantage of fast-track procedures all depends on theaccurate determination of relevant markets.” Chen estimated that more than halfof the transactions are likely to be eligible for fast-track procedures.

    However, the threshold for qualifying mergers is stillconsidered too restrictive based on the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), acommonly used calculation to measure business concentration, according toStephen Harris of Baker & McKenzie, who was quoted in Law360.Although the fast-track process is similar to the EU's simplified mergerprocess, its proposed timeline is much longer than the EU's, which offersdecisions within 25 days.

    The draft proposal classifies cases into three categories:simple, normal and major, each of which are subject to varying timeframes. Theseclassifications will be defined by the combined market share and HHI (see tablebelow).

    Categories

    Simple cases

    Normal cases

    Major cases

    Timeframe

    Decision within 30 days (i.e. Phase I) *

    Decision within 30 days (i.e. Phase I) or within 75 days (i.e. first half of the Phase II 90-day period) *

    Decision within 120 days (i.e. Phase II) or within 180 days (i.e. Phase III) *

    Horizontal concentration

    The combined market share is less than 10%; or the HHI after concentration is less than 1000; or

    The combined market share is more than or equal to 10% but less than 20%; or the HHI after concentration is less than 1500; or

    The combined market share is more than or equal to 20%; or the HHI after concentration is more than or equal to 1500;

    Vertical or mixed concentration

    The relevant market share is less than 20%.

    The relevant market share is more than or equal to 20% but less than 30%

    The relevant market share is more than or equal to 30%;

    *After MOFCOM formally accepts the merger application

    The size of the deal, industry sectors and categorisation ofmarkets are all relevant factors. For example, to define 'product market' in theacquisition of a beer manufacturer, the relevant market would become larger iftaking into account additional beverage products such as fruit juice. Likewise,it would become smaller if only limited to alcoholic drinks. There is also ageographical market, which varies according to the scope and location of themarket.

    “It is like a tagging war. The premise is that you have todefine accurately what constitutes relevant market. The authorities would thendecide whether your case could be assessed under the fast track process,” said Shanghai-basedChen.

    “More haste, less speed,” he added. “If the determination isdoubted, the review process could take even longer than the normal process.”

    Harris, in the same report on Law360,said that combined market share exceeding 20% is unlikely to presentcompetitive concerns, but many of these cases would be categorised into majorcases.

    Consultant Gerry O'Brien of Mayer Brown JSM believed thatmany transactions were normally between competitors in one or more markets, andit would be rare for companies to only have a combined market share of under10% in a relevant market.

    In addition, when the HHI scores trigger a major case reviewat 1,500, it is often taken as an indication of a 'moderately concentratedmarket'. Reviews will still be subject to the pre-merger notification procedure.For example, if pre-merger notification takes 30 days, the proposal wouldresult in a 60-day review (30 days for pre-notification and 30 days forreview).

    MOFCOMpublished its revised application form for anti-monopoly review on June 6.Market observers view it as a positive sign that the authority is cognisantthat improvements need to be made.

    By Janice Qu

    Further reading:


    Inspiring the Law

    Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Law in Trials of Civil Dispute Cases Arising from Monopolistic Acts 关于审理因垄断行为引发的民事纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的规定

    SPC releases first interpretation of the Anti-monopoly Law

    This premium content is reserved for
    China Law & Practice Subscribers.

    • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
    • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
    • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
    For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]