Anti-monopoly Law under scrutiny as key case goes to Higher Court

A vertical price fixing dispute involving Johnson & Johnson has reached the Shanghai Higher People's Court, but one case will not be enough to clarify what constitutes sufficient burden of proof

5 minute readOctober 25, 2012 at 08:50 AM
By
clpstaff
& clp articles

The Shanghai No 1 Intermediate People's Court handed down its judgment in favour of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on May 21. Rainbow Medical Equipment & Supplies then appealed the decision.

A Subscription is Required to Access this Content

Subscribe to China Law & Practice today for:

  • ✓ A database of 3000+ essential documents, including key PRC laws translated into English
  • ✓ Newsletters with business-critical and sector-specific updates
  • ✓ Premium mobile access with timely analysis on China's fast-changing market

Already a Subscriber? Log In. Sign In Now

Questions? Contact us at [email protected] | 1-855-808-4530 (Americas) | 44(0) 800 098 386009 (UK & Europe)