Picking the right arbitration institution in China

Two years after the CIETAC split, unresolved issues such as inconsistent court rulings and confusion over enforcement still remain. Parties are advised to clearly specify the desired institution in their arbitration clauses

12 minute read September 09, 2014 at 09:15 AM
By
clpstaff

It has been more than two years since the outburst of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)'s internal war, which resulted in the unfortunate split of the former branches in Shanghai and Shenzhen from the main body of CIETAC (Beijing headquarters) in 2012.

Exclusive Content

A Subscription is Required to Access this Content

Subscribe to China Law & Practice today for:

  • Access to 3000+ essential documents, including key PRC laws translated into English
  • Newsletters with business-critical and sector-specific updates
  • Premium mobile access with timely analysis on China’s fast-changing market

Already a Subscriber? Log In Here

Questions? Contact us at [email protected] | 1-855-808-4530 (Americas) | 44(0) 800 098 386009 (UK & Europe)