Legislation roundup: CIETAC awards, internet finance and Guangdong FTZ

The SPC has clarified guidelines for court enforcement of arbitration awards, the PBOC has put P2P lending under legal scrutiny and the Guangdong FTZ has opened up to foreign financial institutions

3 minute readJuly 24, 2015 at 05:59 AM
By
clpstaff
& clp articles

Dispute resolution



Supreme People's Court, Official Reply on Issues for Which Instructions Have Been Requested by the Shanghai Municipal Higher People's Court, etc. on Cases Involving the Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards Rendered by Arbitration Institutions such as the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission and its Former Sub-commissions

最高人民法院关于对上海市高级人民法院等就涉及中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会及其原分会等仲裁机构所作仲裁裁决司法审查案件请示问题的批复



Where parties provided in their arbitration agreement executed before South China or Shanghai CIETAC changed their names that disputes were to be referred to the “South China Sub-commission of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission” or the “Shanghai Sub-commission of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission” for arbitration, the South China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission or the Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission shall have jurisdiction over such case.



A Subscription is Required to Access this Content

Subscribe to China Law & Practice today for:

  • ✓ A database of 3000+ essential documents, including key PRC laws translated into English
  • ✓ Newsletters with business-critical and sector-specific updates
  • ✓ Premium mobile access with timely analysis on China's fast-changing market

Already a Subscriber? Log In. Sign In Now

Questions? Contact us at [email protected] | 1-855-808-4530 (Americas) | 44(0) 800 098 386009 (UK & Europe)